I love emacs, but using gdb to debug is a giant leap back to the 1970s. DDD is a very nice graphical debugger for Linux that does what a proper debugger should: set breakpoints, display variable values when you mouse over them, and let you display in a windows. Emacs, make and ddd; maybe I won't miss Eclipse.
The one item that frustrates me is the Emacs next-error command. This was so useful when the compiler had errors in a shell windows as you next-errored through the list while it positioned on the error line in the source in another window. What I get is "No buffers contain error message locations."
UPDATE: The problem is that I wrote a keyboard macro that opens a shell and does a make command. Using the built-in command compile works with next-error as expected.
Conservative. Idaho. Software engineer. Historian. Trying to prevent Idiocracy from becoming a documentary.
Email complaints/requests about copyright infringement to clayton @ claytoncramer.com. Reminder: the last copyright troll that bothered me went bankrupt.
Saturday, October 8, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
There must be a way to get Eclipse CDT to work again. I don't know your environment, but unless it is really odd, it should be one that a lot of other people are using. Have you googling or asking for help?
ReplyDeleteYou could also try Netbeans, which is similar to Eclipse but a totally different project.
In my current C environments, I don't use Eclipse. One environment is an Arduino, so no GUI. The other is Solaris over a VPN, and I just haven't gotten around to making X-windows go through the pipe, although that might change.
Emacs, make, and DDD give me what I need enough that I have interest in returning to the complexity of Eclipse. To much obscurity as to where files are actually stored. Debian Wheezy for LinuxCNC, BTW.
ReplyDeleteI went round and round with Eclipse. Finally gave up and tried NetBeans, got it working with xdebug, and haven't looked back.
ReplyDelete