But not by County of San Diego, who was the defendant, but the California Attorney-General, who has filed as an intervenor because County of San Diego chose not to fight. Count on Kamala Harris to defend a law originally passed as part of a scheme to disarm Chinese and Mexican residents of California, and which today disproportionately disarms blacks and Hispanics.
I understand that there is some question as to whether the California Attorney-General is entitled to file as an intervenor after the decision.
Conservative. Idaho. Software engineer. Historian. Trying to prevent Idiocracy from becoming a documentary.
Email complaints/requests about copyright infringement to clayton @ claytoncramer.com. Reminder: the last copyright troll that bothered me went bankrupt.
Friday, February 28, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Been thinking about this, and it doesn't matter in the long term. Right now the other restrictive counties are being given a chance to surrender like Orange County did, and failures to do so will be followed by lawsuits. I think we can safely assume San Francisco city/county will appeal, and I would be surprised if they didn't appeal it all the way to the Supremes.
ReplyDelete