The whining from the Left will be, "The Supreme Court is ignoring the will of the People." To which we respond, Roe v. Wade (1973), Lawrence v. Texas (2003), Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). If you object to a majority of nine justices telling you the results of an election, why is it okay for them to overturn so many other expressions of popular will? If they raise D.C. v. Heller (2008), just reply, "You set the precedent for this."
Conservative. Idaho. Software engineer. Historian. Trying to prevent Idiocracy from becoming a documentary.
Email complaints/requests about copyright infringement to clayton @ claytoncramer.com. Reminder: the last copyright troll that bothered me went bankrupt.
Wednesday, November 18, 2020
IF the Court Overturns the Pennsylvania Results Forcing the Election into The House
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment