Friday, April 20, 2012

Eco-Terrorists Threatening Us

We know who the active denialists are – not the people who buy the lies, mind you, but the people who create the lies. Let’s start keeping track of them now, and when the famines come, let’s make them pay. Let’s let their houses burn. Let’s swap their safe land for submerged islands. Let’s force them to bear the cost of rising food prices.
They broke the climate. Why should the rest of us have to pay for it?
Obviously, the ideal solution is to get our collective act together and prevent this from happening, but we need a fall-back – a mechanism that puts responsibility for damages on the shoulders of the shirkers and deniers who cause it and profit from it, and we need to build that mechanism before the damages materialize.
Liberals arguing for anarchy.  That makes lots of sense.


  1. Who do they think owns all the guns? It's baffling that these people think if the world collapses someone else is going to protect them. The only thing protecting the coastal elites from the people in flyover country will be flyover countries desire to be left alone and their good nature.

  2. And if it doesn't come to pass, can we bill THEM for all the costs we incurred thanks to their cockamamie schemes?

  3. Oh leftists. If they arn't killing they're dreaming of future killing or trying to explain away past killings.

    1. Hang (and make sure that the hanging takes place in full view of the people) no fewer than one hundred known deniers, shirkers, climate saboteurs.
    2. Publish their names.
    3. Seize all property from them.
    4. Designate hostages in accordance with yesterday's telegram.
    Yours, V.I. Jones, Federal Commissar for Sustainability."

  4. Why would you call this anarchist? The global warming/climate change crowd are pretty solidly in the big government category.
    Is it possible you mean the black clad, rock throwing thugs of the left? They're hardly anarchists even though it is popular to refer to them as such. I doubt these thugs would care much for Nock, Spooner, or Spencer; the traditional anarchists.

    Sorry... pet peeve of mine.

  5. It's a selective anarchism. They want the government's service to go away in one particular area for one particular group of people.