A reader pointed me to a very disturbing, if true, news story in an independent conservative page. 3/15/21 Montana Daily Gazette:
In the early Tuesday morning hours, motion sensors alerted the occupant, hereafter referred to as John Doe (names have been changed to protect the innocent) that there was movement along the driveway to his home. Given the time of day, the location of the home, and some recent history that will be discussed later, Doe knew he needed to react, but in a non-threatening manner. His decision was to put on a pair of pants, remain barefoot and shirtless, and move to the front porch with his hands raised in the air. What appeared in the driveway was the lead vehicle of three BearCat armored personnel carriers – commonly referred to as personnel tanks (pictured left) – in a convoy of over thirty total vehicles.
The BearCats are armed with a rotating turret for housing customer-specific weapon systems. Five gun ports are located on each side of the vehicle, and an additional two on the rear. The vehicle are often equipped with .50 BMG or 7.62mm rifles. It is a military-grade vehicle often used by U.S. Special Forces and the Australian military.
But on this day, they were cruising the Flathead Valley with thirty other police vehicles in tow.
Also surrounding the house were one-hundred-plus federal agents with a helicopter in support. Federal agents immediately took Doe into custody and placed him in loose-fitting flex cuffs into the back of one of the BearCat vehicles. Inside the vehicle, John was placed on the outer wall, and at his feet were loaded weapons. Doe later concluded that this had to be a setup, for if he were to try to free himself, he would likely be killed. Seemingly unbeknownst to the Feds, Doe’s 88-year-old mother (who suffers from dementia) was asleep in the house. The actual homeowner, Jane Doe, was also in the home. This is why Doe wanted to avoid confrontation and the stress of such an event by presenting himself peacefully. What looked to be a quick and peaceful resolution then took a strange turn to the worse. ...
Why did agents breach the house when Doe was already in custody? Counter to standard practice, the team chose to enter a window next to Doe’s basement door. That window is over three feet off the ground and thus difficult to breach and enter by a team that needs to move fast. There are many windows in the house that would have made a breach entry a lot easier. This window was different, not only in its height above ground and the resulting impact on the tactics used, but it is also right next to Doe’s bed. If Doe had not exited the house and moved to the front porch to peacefully present himself, the concussion grenade employed by the breaching team would have landed on him while he was sleeping. There’s no telling what would have happened in that instance, but John’s death is a possibility.
The story presents a plausible reason for a search and arrest, although disproportionate to the claimed level of force. 3/25/21 AmmoLand attempted to verify this horrifying story:
The Sheriff’s Office was the first place to start, and hoping for a written public reply, I asked them to make a statement via Twitter:
“Since your department is named in this report, and since the assessment of its accuracy is of significant public interest, will you please issue a statement of your involvement and the facts as you understand them?”
That was met with several days of silence, so I followed it up with a phone call to the department. I was informed that an email had been circulated internally instructing personnel to refer all inquiries to “the U.S. County Attorney.” The person I spoke with also let slip that the story had “inaccuracies.”
That at least meant they were aware of the story and that something happened.
Since there is a County Attorney and a U.S. Attorney, I contacted the feds next, starting with the Missoula Field Office since it is geographically the closest one. I was informed the public information officer works out of the Billings office, so I called there and had to leave a voicemail message. Shortly thereafter, I received a callback and asked the officer if they had prepared a public statement. She informed me that, per Department of Justice policy, she could neither confirm nor deny anything responsive to my questions about ongoing investigations.
That at least suggests there is an investigation and that it’s ongoing, but confirms nothing.
I also left a voicemail with the County Attorney. As of this writing, I have not heard back but will update this post if I do.
Did the Montana Daily Gazette accurately report what happened? I hope not. But if you had read an account of Ruby Ridge or Waco in 1990, you would have called it an absurd fabrication. If you can find any evidence about this supposed insane raid, please let me know.
Phone calls. As any Doctor will tell you, "If it isn't in writing, it didn't happen." Lawyers know that written inquiries get the attention, and anything in writing should be considered an eventual exhibit to a judge.
ReplyDeleteI'd seen this linked from elsewhere, and my gut-feeling is that the it's a bunch of 'bunkem' clearly tailored to be un-checkable.
ReplyDeleteWe have been treated to a few supposed 'hard fact' details however:
• February 2, 2021 as the date of the raid
• 'Early morning' as the time
• '2 Hours later' when the subject was read his rights, and sometime after this transported to the county jail by sherrif's deputy
• 'released three days later on his own recognizance'
So the subject would have been on the jail roster on February 3 with specific charges listed subsequent to his formal detention on the 2nd, and there would perhaps have been a court appearance recorded on the 4th, 5th, or 6th prior to '3 days later' release. Both of those things are very difficult to hide fully in the US.
https://apps.flathead.mt.gov/jailroster/?&report=inmages&sort=bookdate
Thanks for the Flathead Sheriff's roster link. What a charming bunch.
DeleteI've heard elsewhere this is fake.
ReplyDeleteI've heard elsewhere this is fake, but don't have a link.
ReplyDeleteIf the story is nothing but a fake, then why are Gestapo so cagey about answering questions?
ReplyDelete