Conservative. Idaho. Software engineer. Historian. Trying to prevent Idiocracy from becoming a documentary.
Email complaints/requests about copyright infringement to clayton @ claytoncramer.com. Reminder: the last copyright troll that bothered me went bankrupt.
"And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose." -- Rom. 8:28
I bought a 23" flat panel LCD monitor earlier this year for less than $200. Look at what you can now get for
. What would I need this for? To get lost in the documents I am editing? Still very impressive pricing.
Huh? While inexpensive, the monitor is HD (1920x1080). I usually use a 2560x1600 monitor for programming and for Photoshop. Several acquaintances use two, side-by-side.
Oh, no, I'm a dinosaur for sure! In 2003 I paid $250 for a 16 inch flat screen LCD monitor, and I'm still using it. And now I find that 1080 is not the latest and greatest.
Clayton you can squeeze all the color out of a penny.
ReplyDeleteBad link.
ReplyDeleteHuh? While inexpensive, the monitor is HD (1920x1080). I usually use a 2560x1600 monitor for programming and for Photoshop. Several acquaintances use two, side-by-side.
link fixed--and do I feel antiquated when you tell me that you are using 2560x1600! My PCs are too far back in time to go that high!
ReplyDeleteI just got a new top-end iMac, and the 2560x1440 resolution on the 27" ones is ... impressive.
ReplyDeleteNothing in that size and resolution range is cheap, but boy howdy is it a lot of pixels.
(3.6 million of 'em, to be exact, compared to 1920x1080's 2 million.)
Oh, no, I'm a dinosaur for sure!
ReplyDeleteIn 2003 I paid $250 for a 16 inch flat screen LCD monitor, and I'm still using it.
And now I find that 1080 is not the latest and greatest.