Tuesday, March 8, 2016

I Keep Looking For the Link To The Onion or Sokal's Name As An Author

From the Free Beacon:
The National Science Foundation has spent more than $400,000 on a study that published scientific results on the “relationship between gender and glaciers.”

The paper “Glaciers, gender, and science,” published in January 2016, concluded that “ice is not just ice,” urging scientists to take a “feminist political ecology and feminist postcolonial” approach when they study melting ice caps and climate change.

“Glaciers are key icons of climate change and global environmental change,” the paper by Mark Carey, a professor at the University of Oregon, explained. “However, the relationships among gender, science, and glaciers–particularly related to epistemological questions about the production of glaciological knowledge – remain understudied.”
 I've got it!  Glaciers are frigid, like most feminists! And here's the melting pile of crap your taxes funded!
I could not make this crap up:
 Through a review and synthesis of a multi-disciplinary and wide-ranging literature on human-ice relations, this paper proposes a feminist glaciology framework to analyze human-glacier dynamics, glacier narratives and discourse, and claims to credibility and authority of glaciological knowledge through the lens of feminist studies. As a point of departure, we use ‘glaciology’ in an encompassing sense that exceeds the immediate scientific meanings of the label, much as feminist critiques of geography, for example, have expanded what it is that ‘geography’ might mean vis-à-vis geographic knowledge (Domosh, 1991; Rose, 1993). As such, feminist glaciology has four aspects: (1) knowledge producers, to decipher how gender affects the individuals producing glacier-related knowledges; (2) gendered science and knowledge, to address how glacier science, perceptions, and claims to credibility are gendered; (3) systems of scientific domination, to analyze how power, domination, colonialism, and control – undergirded by and coincident with masculinist ideologies – have shaped glacier-related sciences and knowledges over time; and (4) alternative representations, to illustrate diverse methods and ways – beyond the natural sciences and including what we refer to as ‘folk glaciologies’ – to portray glaciers and integrate counter-narratives into broader conceptions of the cryosphere. 
A reader found a link to the $412,000 government grant that funded this crap.  If there was a political party that cared about government waste, I would ask them to put some oversight into this.

See the advantages of funding NRA/ILA and Calguns Foundation, both of which fund my research.

Sokal: if you don't  know the story.

3 comments:

Steve said...

This looks to be the grant info from the .gov. Apparently glacial retreat is a national security issue too.

http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1253779

athEIst said...

I wondered why this was labeled "feminism" when you have a "mental illness" tag.

Joseph said...

You might try looking up "Queering Outer Space" or "How to Read Donald Duck: Imperialist Ideology in the Disney Comic" or "Words of Power: A Feminist Reading of the History of Logic".

I am not making up any of this.