On pp. 23-24, thr decision cites a law review article by myself and Joe Olson. Time to update my list of citations.
The constitutional question resolves this but I also find myself wondering why, if the goal was to stop strawman purchases, they took such a circuitous path. Private transfer of firearms has been unlawful since 1991. If you find a gun in the hands of a person for whom the gun is not registered, go find the last lawful owner and prosecute him. This assumes the stated goal was to stop strawman purchases.
No comments:
Post a Comment