Showing posts with label identity poltics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label identity poltics. Show all posts

Saturday, October 28, 2017

Not a Deficiency, Right

10/25/17 NBC:
The Hearing World Must Stop Forcing Deaf Culture to Assimilate
Too many hearing people view deafness as a deficiency rather than a separate linguistic context, worldview and culture.
Not a deficiency?  Sad, unfortunate, short one very useful sense, but not a deficiency?  I have worked with several deaf people, and everyone of them would have been overjoyed to have normal hearing.   This identity politics stuff is just deranged.

Tuesday, September 19, 2017

Not Sure How This Comes Up

The National Science Foundation is spending over $100,000 to create "safe zone" inclusion training so more members of the LGBTQ community become engineers.
The project, which will not start until January 2018, is a joint study being conducted by the American Society For Engineering Education, Rowan University, and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The focus of the study is to find ways to combat what the researchers call a "chilly" environment for lesbian, gay, and transgender individuals in engineering labs.
Two separate grants totaling $587,441 were awarded Thursday. A grant worth $473,325 was awarded to the American Society For Engineering Education, and $114,116 was given to the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
"You used the wrong formula for figuring out the load this truss can handle.  I'll bet you have a rainbow sticker on your car!"

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

The Madness Continues

Again from C2C:
And what’s next on the activist agenda? In this world of identity politics on steroids, more and more victim groups are popping up – and all of them “intersect” together. There are people who classify themselves as “transabled”. Alexander Baril of Dalhousie University told the National Post that “we define transability as the desire or the need for a person identified as able-bodied by other people to transform his or her body to obtain physical impairment. The person could want to become deaf, blind, amputee, paraplegic.” Seriously? Self-mutilation to obtain a new identity? Will this be the next group added to the protected human rights list? Don’t bet against it.
You want to have your penis removed and breast implants?  What's wrong with taking out your eyes?  I think I posted something about this a while back.

Wednesday, December 7, 2016

How the Democrats Screwed the Pooch

David Bernstein at Volokh Conspiracy points out how Democratic obsession with crushing Christianity to satisfy the identity politics crowd sank Clinton:
To what can we attribute Trump’s success? The most logical answer is that religious traditionalists felt that their religious liberty was under assault from liberals, and they therefore had to hold their noses and vote for Trump. ...
Megan McArdle of Bloomberg similarly pointed out, “Over the last few years, as controversies have erupted over the rights of cake bakers and pizza places to refuse to cater gay weddings, the rights of nuns to refuse to provide insurance that covers birth control, the rights of Catholic hospitals to refuse to perform abortions, and the rights of Christian schools to teach (and require students and teachers to practice) traditional Christian morality, some Christians have begun to feel that their communities are under existential threat.”
Let’s focus on one of these incidents, the time the solicitor general of the United States acknowledged that religious institutions that oppose as a matter of internal policy same-sex marriage may lose their tax exemptions. At oral argument in the Obergefell same-sex marriage case, there was the following colloquy:
Justice Samuel Alito: Well, in the Bob Jones case, the Court held that a college was not entitled to tax­exempt status if it opposed interracial marriage or interracial dating. So would the same apply to a university or a college if it opposed same­ sex marriage?
Soliticitor General Verrilli: You know, I ­, I don’t think I can answer that question without knowing more specifics, but it’s certainly going to be an issue. ­ I don’t deny that. I don’t deny that, Justice Alito. It is ­­it is going to be an issue.

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

A Twofer

Identity politics is nasty business.  It was nasty when Democrats asserted that this was a white man's republic, and it isn't any nicer now that other identity groups are preeminent.  From August 26, 2015 Daily Mail:
'Why did I do it? I put down a deposit for a gun on 6/19/15. The Church shooting in Charleston happened on 6/17/15…'

'What sent me over the top was the church shooting. And my hollow point bullets have the victims’ initials on them.'

'As for Dylann Roof? You [redacted]! You want a race war [redacted]? BRING IT THEN YOU WHITE …[redacted]!!!”

At the same time, he professes a deep respect for other mass shooters like Virginia Tech gunman Seung-Hui Cho.

'Also, I was influenced by Seung–Hui Cho. That’s my boy right there. He got NEARLY double the amount that Eric Harris and Dylann Klebold got…just sayin’.
He goes on to say that he has faced both racial and sexual discrimination as a black, gay man and that he was just waiting to explode.

I guess same-sex marriage was not enough.

UPDATE: As my wife pointed out, the left keeps banging the drum with the race card, and then gets upset that they provoke gun violence.  "If you keep saying there are monsters in the castle, eventually the peasants will show up with torches."