Showing posts with label lawfare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lawfare. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 9, 2025

Charges Dismissed in Michigan Electors Case

 9/9/25 Michigan Bridge:

LANSING — Michigan’s so-called false electors case is over and defendants will not stand trial after prosecutors failed to prove 15 Republicans knowingly committed a crime by signing a document incorrectly claiming President Donald Trump won the state’s 2020 presidential election, a judge ruled Tuesday. 

“This is a fraud case, and (you) have to prove intent,” Lansing 54-A District Court Judge Kristen Simmons told a packed courtroom, “and I don’t believe that there’s evidence sufficient to prove intent.”

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel had charged the defendants — including former Republican National Committee member Kathy Berden and former Michigan GOP Chair Meshawn Maddock — with eight felony counts, including forgery charges Simmons said pertained more to property crimes than the facts of the case.

The question of whether Biden actually won Michigan was a legitimate question.  There were so many irregularities in the COVID election (mail-in ballots of questionable origin, implausible numbers of 110+ old Pennsylvania voters requesting absentee ballots, clear evidence of ballot harvestimg, some clear-cut fraud involving a California friend's non-citizen wife shown as voting by mail, whose votes were counted the day after the election when she did not vote) that a person could genuinely believe the election results were as trustworthy as Biden's autopen pardons.  Providing an alternate set of electors in case Congress decided to investigate these iregularities seems a legitimate action.  If not for the J6ers idiocy, I think it possible that Congress might have at least asked questions much as the contested 1876 election involved challenges to the results from several states.  (Thanks J6ers for guaranteeing President Autopen and likely the Ukraine War.)

Thursday, August 21, 2025

Trump's Fraud Case

 8/21//25 AP:

NEW YORK (AP) — An appeals court has thrown out the massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump, ruling Thursday in New York state’s lawsuit accusing him of exaggerating his wealth.

The decision came seven months after the Republican returned to the White House. A panel of five judges in New York’s mid-level Appellate Division said the verdict, which stood to cost Trump more than $515 million and rock his real estate empire, was “excessive.”

After finding that Trump engaged in fraud by flagrantly padding financial statements that went to lenders and insurers, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered him last year to pay $355 million in penalties. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million.

The total — combined with penalties levied on some other Trump Organization executives, including Trump’s sons Eric and Donald Jr. — now exceeds $527 million, with interest.“

 

While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants’ business culture, the court’s disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,” Judges Dianne T. Renwick and Peter H. Moulton wrote in one of several opinions shaping the appeals court’s ruling.

It is an article of faith in some circles that Trump is a rapist and conman.  I suspect very little to none of of this weird fraud claim will survive appeals.  When the victims offer to testify on behalf of who supposedly victimized them, it is not much of a case.

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Lawfare for You, and You, and You

This looks like and may well be revenge for what N.Y. A-G did to Trump. Nonetheless, it would be quite appropriate for Ms. James to find out what it is like, even this turns out to be "the process is the punishment ."

The allegations in a request for criminal referral include:

1. Claiming a house she purchased in Virginia was her primary residence, when N.Y. law required her to be an N.Y. resident.

2. Misrepresenting a property in N.Y. to get a more favorable interest rate.

3. Claiming she and her father were buying a house as "husband and wife."