Federal law largely exempts pre-1898 firearms from regulation, on the grounds that these are antique weapons, and not terribly useful to a criminal. This is a bit of an overstatement, but you have to draw a line somewhere between modern weapons and antique weapons.
In the course of my research into knives and the Second Amendment, I found a discussion in David Wong's Knife Laws of the Fifty States of Mich. Comp. Laws sec. 750.222a, which defines a "double-edged, nonfolding stabbing instrument" but does not include "a knife, tool, implement, arrowhead, or artifact manufactured from stone by means of conchoidal fracturing."
Conservative. Idaho. Software engineer. Historian. Trying to prevent Idiocracy from becoming a documentary.
Email complaints/requests about copyright infringement to clayton @ claytoncramer.com. Reminder: the last copyright troll that bothered me went bankrupt.
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Ah, but subsection 2 to that statute declares that such protection of neolithic knives disappears if you are transporting it in a vehicle unless it is in a container inaccesible to the driver.
ReplyDeleteThus no Flintstone-style transport of flinty knives for you!
I don't think this law affects Indian tribes.
ReplyDeleteHowever, it would affect anyone who buys reproduction (or original!) arrowheads or knives from stores in the Indian reservations.