Computer modelling used a decade ago to predict how quickly global average temperatures would rise may have forecast too much warming, a study has found....
The study, published this week in the journal Nature Geoscience, does not play down the threat which climate change has to the environment, and maintains that major reductions in emissions must be attained.
But the findings indicate the danger may not be as acute as was previously thought.
Myles Allen, professor of geosystem science at the University of Oxford and one of the study’s authors told The Times: “We haven’t seen that rapid acceleration in warming after 2000 that we see in the models. We haven’t seen that in the observations.”Caught with their pants down. and 9/19/17 Daily Nail:
In a study just published by the respected journal Nature Geoscience, a group of British academics reveals that the immediate threat from global warming is lower than previously thought, because the computer models used by climate change experts are flawed.
According to these models, temperatures across the world should now be at least 1.3 degrees above the mid-19th century average, which is taken as a base level in such calculations. But the British report demonstrates that the rise is only between 0.9 and 1 degree.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4901278/Report-shows-world-isn-t-warm-greens-warned.html#ixzz4tCIEN7Vh Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
They are backpedaling as fast as they can, hoping to avoid the blunt truth: their models were and are entirely wrong.
ReplyDeleteAs you know: Garbage In, Garbage Out.