6/18/17 Daily Mail:
Police hold back furious crowd as they arrest 'terror attacker who ploughed into a crowd of Good Samaritans helping collapsed OAP' before brave worshippers managed to pin him to the groundFortunately no one dead as of yet. Revenge for Islamoterrorist attacks. This is not only morally wrong:
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4616452/Man-arrested-van-ploughs-people-outside-mosque.html#ixzz4kSy7BS6T Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
1. Most Muslims do not support Islamoterrorist attacks.
2. Most victims worldwide of Islamoterrorism are Muslims.
3. It is random attack on innocent civilians.
It is also pragmatically wrong:
1. May drive some Muslims into lone wolf attacks.
2. Creates fear of the larger non-Islamic society.
3. Probably reduces willingness of Muslims to report extremists.
4. Gives ISIS an excuse for more terrorist attacks.
That's not just any mosque - that is the Finsbury Park Mosque, which this man led from 1997 to 2003.
ReplyDeletehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Hamza_al-Masri
The mosque appears to have de-radicalized since al-Masri's departure. under new management.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finsbury_Park_Mosque
Shedding its old notoriety is an upward climb. If it or any other Muslim institution wants to be taken seriously as a partner in peace, it must directly address the Koranic bottleneck - it must demonstrate cogently and conspicuously that Mohammed's prolific military commands were issued to contemporaries only and not to future generations. Islamic supremacism rests on the opposite claim, that Mohammed promised eventual world conquest, and it will continue to make converts as long as no organized opposing gospel within Islam exists.