tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2807403883562053852.post1441754069029403733..comments2024-03-27T08:40:31.785-06:00Comments on Clayton Cramer.: A Major Victory in IllinoisClayton Cramerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03258083387204776812noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2807403883562053852.post-40259928428860654202019-03-25T14:37:55.799-06:002019-03-25T14:37:55.799-06:00Unfortunately this is only a state of Illinois cas...Unfortunately this is only a state of Illinois case so far. I had forgotten that the poll tax was explicity forbidden by the 24th Amendment and not by a SCOTUS ruling. However, one could argue the analog.JLW IIIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06058544501109588908noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2807403883562053852.post-54597362467671043002019-03-25T13:39:01.837-06:002019-03-25T13:39:01.837-06:00Sounds great, but the devil's in the details. ...Sounds great, but the devil's in the details. The decision relies on the "privileges or immunities" clause of the 14th amendment. That clause was badly gutted back in the 1870s, and only Thomas, of the current court, seems to want to revive it. Maybe the new kids will chime in, maybe not.<br /><br />On the other hand, I'm no lawyer, so who knows? Dorsaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17253950621398998384noreply@blogger.com