tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2807403883562053852.post2558951786479809782..comments2024-03-27T08:40:31.785-06:00Comments on Clayton Cramer.: Democrats As Slow LearnersClayton Cramerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03258083387204776812noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2807403883562053852.post-44741368274581878882015-03-14T14:27:30.503-06:002015-03-14T14:27:30.503-06:00They keep hoping and hoping that with just a few m...They keep hoping and hoping that with just a few more pushes, America will be disarmed. And then they won't have to worry about being elected anymore. Who will stand in their way?one_of_manyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16870782536865250105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2807403883562053852.post-27912473637947889252015-03-14T11:57:51.374-06:002015-03-14T11:57:51.374-06:00Yep. If there exists a possibility that a bad but ...Yep. If there exists a possibility that a bad but terminally-defective policy might be enacted or enforced, sometimes the best answer is to challenge the matter in court, hoisting the policy by its over-reaching petard. Brandon Combshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04146356160351901702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2807403883562053852.post-77266277910724130362015-03-14T02:34:02.705-06:002015-03-14T02:34:02.705-06:00Bias much, right there in the first paragraph....Bias much, right there in the first paragraph....Mauserhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11732614352398473302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2807403883562053852.post-65108128061153197792015-03-13T19:44:26.335-06:002015-03-13T19:44:26.335-06:00The Heller attorneys cabal is well aware of this d...The Heller attorneys cabal is well aware of this defect. When your enemy is digging a deep hole, it is best to wait until they are in over their heads to point this out.Clayton Cramerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03258083387204776812noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2807403883562053852.post-72795726982515031462015-03-13T16:46:17.435-06:002015-03-13T16:46:17.435-06:00I've written extensively of late (including to...I've written extensively of late (including to the BATFE, NRA, GOA, and my federal political representatives) about how the existing classification of M855 is not legal under the referenced 18 USC definition of armor piercing ammunition. For the life of me, I don't understand why no one with a national platform available to them (i.e., the politicians, pundits, and the lobbying organizations) is making this point: that the very 18 USC subsection the BATFE is referencing as categorizing M855 as armor piercing actually PRECLUDES that particular round on definitional grounds. It doesn't qualify for an exemption in the first place, let alone a revocation of one. Seems to me like the easiest, most efficient, and most conclusive argument to make, but it's not happening for whatever reason (maybe I'm just missing something obvious)…<br /><br />https://giftoffreedom.wordpress.com/2015/02/28/decomposing-the-proposed-m855-ammunition-ban/<br /><br />By the way, I recently received my copy of Armed America and am really looking forward to reading it.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com